Feature

Inspiration, Insurgency, Evolution

E-mail Print PDF

Diane Paulus
Diane Paulus
Diane Paulus opens up about the urge to court controversy and create community with her unusual projects

[Diane granted us two interviews -- one before the Broadway opening of Porgy and Bess, one after. We had a LOT of material from those interviews, more than we could trim to fit in this print version of the article. To read everything Diane had to say, including her take on unconventional spaces and advice for an young director, check out the companion piece here. -ed.]

As artistic director of the American Repertory Theater in Boston and through her freelance directing, Diane Paulus seeks to reshape our notions of what the theatrical experience is all about. For her, theatre is not simply an event to sit down and enjoy. She wants you to bask in the performance and even become a part of it, as she has done with her rousing rendition of Hair, her standing room nightclub shows like The Donkey Show and Prometheus Bound, and the unorthodox Sleep No More, the  installation piece chronicling Macbeth’s mental breakdown.

Add a comment
Read more...
 
Feature

More from Diane Paulus

E-mail Print PDF

Diane Paulus with her Tony Award for directing Hair.
Diane Paulus with her Tony Award for directing Hair.
The artistic director of American Repertory Theater spends more time with SD.

Diane Paulus had a lot to say, above and beyond her words on the Porgy and Bess revision. In our two conversations with her she held forth whether commercial concerns affect her work, why she challenges presentation conventions, and even had some advice for directors starting out. All this and a slideshow of images from the Broadway production of The Gershwins’ Porgy and Bess after the jump!

Add a comment
Read more...
 
Feature

Script Change?

E-mail Print PDF

The Washington Senators became the Pittsburgh Pirates in the Manatee Players production of Damn Yankees.
The Washington Senators became the Pittsburgh Pirates in the Manatee Players production of Damn Yankees.
Copyright law requires permission before touching a script here’s how to make it work

It’s not uncommon for directors to regard the script as a starting point—allowing for changes that may be needed to make the show work in their theatre, with their actors and their audience. They might consider cutting lines, changing the gender or name of a character, resetting the play in a different locale or time period, or removing objectionable language.

Add a comment
Read more...
 
Feature

Script Licensing Language

E-mail Print PDF

Here's the contract language from a few of the large play publishers stating their policy on script changes:

Add a comment
Read more...
 
Light On The Subject

Ethics Revisited

E-mail Print PDF

The incandescent color spectrum curve
The incandescent color spectrum curve
There's a time and place for everything, including amber.

In the September 2011 issue I wrote a piece, “The Ethics of Color,” where I proposed a very specific approach to the use of color media in the theatre. Two concerns were brought up about this by readers (and myself upon a later read). First: The approach did not take into consideration the myriad lamp types we have beyond the ubiquitous HPL for Source 4. And second: The piece may have given the impression that amber is never a good choice. This is far from the case.

Add a comment
Read more...
 
Editor's Note

We're Practically Giving Them Away

E-mail Print PDF

SD Editor Jacob Coakley
SD Editor Jacob Coakley
How do you get what you're getting?

Yesterday was an online day of protest against the SOPA and PIPA acts, which would drastically re-write laws regarding how the law handles copyright infringers online. The backers of the bills say that the laws are necessary to stop content piracy, which is hurting the entertainment industry through lost jobs and untold millions of lost income. It is important to keep in mind that the people saying these things are also the people who thought that VCR’s would destroy the movie industry and who sued a deceased grandmother for downloading music files.

Add a comment
Read more...
 
Answer Box

You Say Tomato, I Say Go Cue 5,384

E-mail Print PDF

Scott Richard Foster and Antoinette LaVecchia in You Say Tomato, I Say Shut Up!
Scott Richard Foster and Antoinette LaVecchia in You Say Tomato, I Say Shut Up!
A touring production with too much going on uses technology to simplify

When the design team for the inaugural production of You Say Tomato, I Say Shut Up!, by Annabelle Gurwitch and Jeff Kahn, sat down for their first design conversation, everything sounded pretty simple. It was a small, two-person touring show: unit set, props and costumes should fit into a couple of roadcases, minimal lighting requirements, a few atmospheric sound cues, that sort of thing. The requirements quickly grew, however. Set in the framework of an anniversary dinner, the play details the trials and tribulations of the couple’s relationship in hilarious vignettes covering first meeting, courtship and marriage as it travels back and forth in time and location—a challenging sequence for a small tour. By the time the show opened in Charlotte there were nearly 100 light cues, half a dozen practicals and around 50 sound cues, all needing to be run by one operator over the course of a 75-minute show.

Add a comment
Read more...
 
TD Talk

Time to Get Tested

E-mail Print PDF

Stephen Ellison
Stephen Ellison
For everyone’s safety, let’s bust a few fire curtain myths

Periodically, J.R. Clancy sends out a “Rigging Report” newsletter; you can sign up on their website if you do not get it already. The November edition of this newsletter, written by Eric Mueller, asked the question, “Is your fire safety curtain closed?” This question made me pause, challenging my understanding about fire curtains and how to use them. I did some research, and found a couple of the things I thought I knew about fire curtains were wrong. So let’s talk about the reality of the care and feeding of a fire curtain and dispel some of these myths.

Add a comment
Read more...
 
Audio

Sanken COS-11D HWM Miniature Head-Worn Microphone

E-mail Print PDF

The COS-11D head-worn condenser microphone in use
The COS-11D head-worn condenser microphone in use
A gear review of the Sanken COS-11D HWM miniature head-worn microphone

When I first got the email to review the new Sanken COS-11D microphone, I was pretty excited. In general, headset mics are very handy. The user has both of their hands free to play an instrument, give a presentation, draw on a whiteboard or just use two-hand gestures (if they are Italian). Plus, they have the freedom to move about the stage or audience. The downside of these mics is that they don’t really sound very natural, and they can be prone to feedback.

Add a comment
Read more...
 
Audio

Clear-Com HME DX210 Digital Wireless Intercom

E-mail Print PDF

The Clear-com HME DX210
The Clear-com HME DX210
A long look at the Clear-Com HME DX210

During November and December, I had the opportunity to field test Clear-Com’s latest wireless system: the HME DX210. The HME DX210 is a two-channel intercom system that operates in the 2.4GHz band. Its basic setup consists of a 1RU base station (BS210), beltpacks (BP210) and an all-in-one wireless headset (WH210). In addition to testing the system amongst the audio crew, we also let our stage ops have at it, using the system in the run of our holiday musical, A Christmas Memory. Add a comment

Read more...
 
  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  4 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »


Theatreface Community Feed

  • Photos posted by Chris Williams
    Thumbnail
    Thumbnail
    Thumbnail
  • Blog post by Robert Perry

    Lighting Designers needed at SETC

    I am currently looking for 2 lighting designers to present their work at the upcoming SETC conference in Chattanooga for the "Design South: Lighting" seminar.  The seminar will focus on two lighting designers who primarily work in the southern US.  The seminar is a total of 50 minutes long, so each designer will have about 20 minutes to present their overall work and answer any questions.  The seminar is currently scheduled for Thursday, March 8th from 12pm-12:50pm.  If you are interested please contact me at rperry4@vcu.edu.  Thanks.Robert PerrySETC "Design South: Lighting" seminar coordinatorVirginia Commonwealth Universityrperry4@vcu.edu(917) 701-1968See More
  • A blog post by Rich Dionne was featured

    Mechanical Design: Inertia

    The last few weeks in our mechanical design class have had students wrestling with two concepts: the force required to overcome an object’s inertia, and the force required to overcome friction between and object and the world around it. In concept, neither of these topics are inherently complicated to understand; however, in practice—when applied to complex, real-world problems—it can be difficult to determine how and why to deploy particular equations. InertiaInertia, as stated by Newton, represents the tendency of a stationery object to stay at rest, and a moving object to stay moving. Because of this tendency, it takes a certain amount of force to cause a stationery object to move and a moving object to stop moving (or otherwise change its velocity). This force is dependent on two things: the object’s mass, and the rate of acceleration desired. You remember mass: the property of an object that represents how much stuff makes it up. Mass is different from weight; weight is a force: the result of the pull of gravity on our mass. This is why we weigh differently when on the moon, say, or in orbit around the Earth, but need to provide the same amount of push to move around: we have the same mass, but are acted upon differently by different pulls of gravity. In order to determine the force required to overcome an object’s inertia, we need to know that object’s mass, as opposed to its weight. The equation to determine the force required to overcome inertia is a simple one:Where Fa is the force required (i.e., how hard you have to push on an object to get it moving if it is stationary) and, in the US, is usually in units of pounds; m is the mass of an object, and a is the rate of acceleration desired for the movement. An object’s weight is determined by the same formula: your weight is the force you feel when your mass is accelerated by gravity. To determine an object’s mass is as simple as substituting known quantities into the above equation (the weight of an object and the rate of acceleration due to gravity) and solving for mass. We can determine the mass of a 100 pound object (the acceleration due to gravity on Earth is 32.2 ft/sec2):(Slugs is an imperial unit of measurement to represent the mass of an object; it’s a little easier to say and write than “pound-seconds-squared per foot.”)After you’ve determined the mass of the object to be moved, you multiply that value by how quickly you intend to get the object moving (i.e., its rate of acceleration) to determine how much force you need to apply to make that acceleration happen. (Determining the rate of acceleration is part of the development of the motion profiles for a particular move, as discussed [last week].) For example, a flown unit which weighs 100 pounds must accelerate at about 3.2 ft/sec2. We know from above that the mass of a 100 pound object is 3.11 slugs; substituting mass and acceleration in our formula, we get: In order to get this 100# object moving, we’d need to apply about 10 pounds of force to overcome inertia. (There’s still friction to deal with, but let’s save that for next week!) Fair enough. The application of the formula is pretty straightforward if you consider accelerating an object that is at rest. But in a scenic move, in what other situations might we need to apply this formula? There are two that immediately come to mind: decelerating an object (i.e., getting a planned movement to stop) and the deceleration that occurs in an emergency-stop situation. Consider that during the move described above, our scenic unit reaches a maximum velocity of 8 ft/second. That’s really fast, but the motion profile I used to determine the properties of this move is triangular, meaning we accelerate to this speed over half the move, and decelerate for the other half of the move—in other words, we’re only travelling at this rate for a fraction of a second. Because the motion profile is triangular, and we’re accelerating and decelerating each for half the move, the rate of deceleration is the same as the rate of acceleration—and, consequently, the force required to decelerate the mass of the unit is the same as that to accelerate it. But what if we had to stop this unit abruptly because of some unexpected, dangerous situation? Assuming that we’re using an integrated-brake-motor, we know that the application of the brake will stop the unit at a particular rate; in our case, we might determine that the application of the brake in an e-stop situation might bring the entire system to a halt in about half a second. In a worst-case scenario—the brake kicking on at our highest velocity—we’d be decelerating from 8 ft/sec to 0 ft/sec in 0.5 seconds: a rate of deceleration of 16 ft/sec2. When the brake kicks on, the moving unit will pull on the system with a force equal to that required to decelerate the mass of the unit at 16 ft/sec2:The force generated by the e-stop situation is nearly five times that generated by our relatively-gentle acceleration during the actual move! This is important information, as it means that all of the elements of our system need to be rated to handle this five-times-higher load, or when that brake kicks in, there’s a chance, for example, that the shackle connecting the unit to the aircraft cable on the winch drum might snap, and the wagon will keep moving. (Obviously, this is less than likely with a 50-pound load, but remember that our unit was fairly light-weight at 100 pounds; a typical scenic wagon might easily be as much as 10 times this weight.) Next week: FrictionSee More
  • Blog post by Rich Dionne

    Mechanical Design: Inertia

    The last few weeks in our mechanical design class have had students wrestling with two concepts: the force required to overcome an object’s inertia, and the force required to overcome friction between and object and the world around it. In concept, neither of these topics are inherently complicated to understand; however, in practice—when applied to complex, real-world problems—it can be difficult to determine how and why to deploy particular equations. InertiaInertia, as stated by Newton, represents the tendency of a stationery object to stay at rest, and a moving object to stay moving. Because of this tendency, it takes a certain amount of force to cause a stationery object to move and a moving object to stop moving (or otherwise change its velocity). This force is dependent on two things: the object’s mass, and the rate of acceleration desired. You remember mass: the property of an object that represents how much stuff makes it up. Mass is different from weight; weight is a force: the result of the pull of gravity on our mass. This is why we weigh differently when on the moon, say, or in orbit around the Earth, but need to provide the same amount of push to move around: we have the same mass, but are acted upon differently by different pulls of gravity. In order to determine the force required to overcome an object’s inertia, we need to know that object’s mass, as opposed to its weight. The equation to determine the force required to overcome inertia is a simple one:Where Fa is the force required (i.e., how hard you have to push on an object to get it moving if it is stationary) and, in the US, is usually in units of pounds; m is the mass of an object, and a is the rate of acceleration desired for the movement. An object’s weight is determined by the same formula: your weight is the force you feel when your mass is accelerated by gravity. To determine an object’s mass is as simple as substituting known quantities into the above equation (the weight of an object and the rate of acceleration due to gravity) and solving for mass. We can determine the mass of a 100 pound object (the acceleration due to gravity on Earth is 32.2 ft/sec2):(Slugs is an imperial unit of measurement to represent the mass of an object; it’s a little easier to say and write than “pound-seconds-squared per foot.”)After you’ve determined the mass of the object to be moved, you multiply that value by how quickly you intend to get the object moving (i.e., its rate of acceleration) to determine how much force you need to apply to make that acceleration happen. (Determining the rate of acceleration is part of the development of the motion profiles for a particular move, as discussed [last week].) For example, a flown unit which weighs 100 pounds must accelerate at about 3.2 ft/sec2. We know from above that the mass of a 100 pound object is 3.11 slugs; substituting mass and acceleration in our formula, we get: In order to get this 100# object moving, we’d need to apply about 10 pounds of force to overcome inertia. (There’s still friction to deal with, but let’s save that for next week!) Fair enough. The application of the formula is pretty straightforward if you consider accelerating an object that is at rest. But in a scenic move, in what other situations might we need to apply this formula? There are two that immediately come to mind: decelerating an object (i.e., getting a planned movement to stop) and the deceleration that occurs in an emergency-stop situation. Consider that during the move described above, our scenic unit reaches a maximum velocity of 8 ft/second. That’s really fast, but the motion profile I used to determine the properties of this move is triangular, meaning we accelerate to this speed over half the move, and decelerate for the other half of the move—in other words, we’re only travelling at this rate for a fraction of a second. Because the motion profile is triangular, and we’re accelerating and decelerating each for half the move, the rate of deceleration is the same as the rate of acceleration—and, consequently, the force required to decelerate the mass of the unit is the same as that to accelerate it. But what if we had to stop this unit abruptly because of some unexpected, dangerous situation? Assuming that we’re using an integrated-brake-motor, we know that the application of the brake will stop the unit at a particular rate; in our case, we might determine that the application of the brake in an e-stop situation might bring the entire system to a halt in about half a second. In a worst-case scenario—the brake kicking on at our highest velocity—we’d be decelerating from 8 ft/sec to 0 ft/sec in 0.5 seconds: a rate of deceleration of 16 ft/sec2. When the brake kicks on, the moving unit will pull on the system with a force equal to that required to decelerate the mass of the unit at 16 ft/sec2:The force generated by the e-stop situation is nearly five times that generated by our relatively-gentle acceleration during the actual move! This is important information, as it means that all of the elements of our system need to be rated to handle this five-times-higher load, or when that brake kicks in, there’s a chance, for example, that the shackle connecting the unit to the aircraft cable on the winch drum might snap, and the wagon will keep moving. (Obviously, this is less than likely with a 50-pound load, but remember that our unit was fairly light-weight at 100 pounds; a typical scenic wagon might easily be as much as 10 times this weight.) Next week: FrictionSee More
  • Status posted by Megan Noll
    rehearsals are in full swing for Disney's HIGH SCHOOL MUSICAL 2! :o) finishing up our run of I LOVE YOU BECAUSE :o(
  • Photos posted by Shireen Mirau
    Thumbnail
    Thumbnail
    Thumbnail
  • A blog post by Erich Friend was featured

    Three for the Price of One

    It's been a busy week here at TheatreFace, so rather than whipping-up something more, I'm going to refer you to three very interesting conversations already in-play.Weapons on Stage:  More specifically - Shotguns.  Phil Funkenbusch asked about this in the Literary Forum at http://theatreface.ning.com/forum/topics/shotgun-rifle-prop.  This is a serious issue that if not addressed with the utmost care can disrupt a department, school, and even the community.  There have been numerous deaths due to firearms misuse on stage, one of the most famous was Brandon Lee, the son of martial arts expert Bruce Lee.  Guns thought to be only loaded with blanks can kill someone, too.  Two recent incidents happened this way: John Eric Hexum died in 1984, and in the fall of 2008, a High School student, Tucker Thayer, made the same tragic error while working as a technician for a production of Oklahoma!Planning a Theatre Safety Curriculum was brought-up by Matthew Overturf in the Backstage Forum at http://theatreface.ning.com/forum/topics/theatre-safety-curriculum.  This can be an expansive subject and requires some preplanning so as to get the most important parts defined up-front, then the supporting elements addressed as the school year progresses.  PLEASE JOIN IN THIS CONVERSATION SO WE CAN ALL HELP TO GET THIS TOPIC COVERED MORE THOROUGHLY.Building a Black Box Theatre was discussed at the Theatre Design and Construction Forum.  Miriam Morgan wanted to know about some of the planning issues that should be considered for converting 'found space' for her Fine Arts Department.  There have been many insightful comments by a variety of practitioners, and they all seem to point the same direction – Planning first and Building second.  Do you have any anecdotal experience with converting / repurposing existing buildings into theatre production spaces?  Sign-up for this group and let us know!See More
More from: Latest Activity on TheatreFace >>>